Software, BPO industry growth will slow down in 2009: NASSCOM
NEW DELHI: The software and business process outsourcing (BPO) industry's growth is expected to slow down considerably next financial year, the organisation representing the Indian software industry says in its annual report released Wednesday.
The National Association of Software and Service Companies (Nasscom) report said while the industry clocked a combined growth rate of 28.2 percent in 2007-08, this is expected to slow down to between 21-24 percent in the next fiscal.
But even the projected growth rate of 21-24 percent is "robust" and in sync with the industry target of achieving $60 billion of exports by 2010, Nasscom president Som Mittal told reporters.
He said the industry was "right on target" to achieve the 2010 export goal.
"In the last eight years the average growth rate has been 33.7 percent. We have had as much as 50 percent growth in a single year initially. But it is natural for the growth to stabilise as the industry grows," he said.
The gross revenue from domestic as well as export markets increased to $52 billion in 2007-08 as compared to $39.6 billion the year before.
However, the growth rate fell from around 33 percent in 2006-07.
Exports of information technology (IT) services alone grew by 28.2 percent to gross $23.1 billion, while the BPO sector showed an increase of 30 percent, fetching $10.9 as compared to $8.4 billion the previous fiscal.
Mittal said the industry handled the subprime mortgage crisis in the US well by venturing into industries that were not affected, such as transport, telecom and healthcare.
He, however, admitted that 2007-08 was a "difficult" year because of slowdown in the US economy, the oil and food crises, and currency fluctuations.
Mittal said the full impact of the situation in the US is yet to be felt by Indian companies, and that corporates would have to find ways to cut costs and enhance productivity.
"The cost-cutting measures can have an impact on recruiting process of these companies and the pay-packages offered to fresh graduates," he added.
IT services and the BPO sector has a two million-strong workforce that is increasing by 26 percent annually, the Nasscom report stated.
Mittal brushed aside concerns about the future of outsourcing as it has become a major issue in the run-up to the presidential elections in the US.
"In 2003-04 elections also, offshoring had become a major issue, but the industry has only grown ever since. It is more of an emotive issue. Barack Obama, (the Democratic hopeful) who once voiced his concerns about outsourcing recently acknowledged its importance and referred to it as 'inevitable'," he said.
FACTBOX: McCain and Obama on health care and retirement
(Reuters) - Health care has ranked among the top issues with U.S. voters in this presidential election cycle, and the Social Security retirement program is a perennial issue for the country's influential elderly population.
Both Barack Obama, who has claimed the Democratic nomination, and John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, have offered health care and retirement proposals. Here is a summary of their positions.
HEALTH CARE
McCain would end tax breaks for employer-provided health insurance and instead provide a refundable tax credit of $2,500 per person, or $5,000 for families, to help people buy health policies. He would promote competition by allowing people to buy insurance across state lines and he would make it tougher to sue doctors in some cases.
Obama has proposed a national insurance program to allow individuals and small businesses to buy affordable health care similar to that available to federal employees, funded by a tax on employers who don't provide coverage. Individuals would not lose coverage when they switch jobs.
He would lower premiums through a program that would reduce the exposure of employer health plans to the costs of a catastrophic illness. Drug costs would be lowered by allowing patients to buy drugs from abroad and letting the government negotiate for lower prices.
SOCIAL SECURITY
McCain has said he would work with Congress to rein in the growing costs of retirement programs and has suggested changing the way benefits are indexed to inflation. He has also supported creating private retirement accounts for younger workers.
Obama opposes private retirement accounts. Affluent workers would pay more in taxes to ensure that Social Security is fully funded.
Obama wants to automatically enroll workers in retirement plans to boost savings, though employees could opt out if they choose.
(Compiled by Andy Sullivan, Donna Smith and JoAnne Allen; editing by David Wiessler)
Obama for tough stance against job outsourcing by companies
Washington, Jun 28 | Press Trust of India
Taking a tough stand against outsourcing, the presumptive Democratic nominee Senator Barack Obama said that the choice is between giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas or give benefit to those corporations that keep jobs domestically.
"We can keep giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, or we can give tax benefits to companies that invest right here in New Hampshire," Senator Obama said at a joint appearance with Senator Hillary Clinton in Unity, New Hampshire.
"We can have a tax code that rewards wealth and hands out billions of dollars more to big corporations and multimillionaires. Or we can provide a USD 1,000 tax cut to 95 per cent of families in America, start rewarding work and not just wealth, and eliminate income taxes for seniors making USD 50,000 a year or less," Obama said, adding that's an agenda for change that we can believe in. That's the choice that we can make in this election.
"We can allow millions of Americans to work full-time but still not make enough to support their families, or we can raise the minimum wage, index it to inflation, and ensure that hard work pays off in America," the Illinois Senator said. - PTI
Keeping healthcare reform on the front burner
By Ellen Lutch Bender | June 16, 2008 | boston.com
NO SINGLE reform would do as much to improve the wealth of our nation and the lives of Americans as a comprehensive overhaul of our healthcare system. But the best chance of swift and major reform may have died with the end of Hillary Clinton's run for the White House.
Senator Clinton kept healthcare on the front burner, promising action in her first term. Healthcare has already slipped as the top domestic concern, a position it held earlier in the campaign for the first time since the last Clinton campaign in 1992. The economy has passed it. But you can't have a healthy economy without a functioning healthcare system.
Unfortunately, there are no easy fixes, no simple wands that can be waved to solve what ails our healthcare delivery system. Also, there are far too many constituents to alienate along the way.
America should be the envy of the world when it comes to delivering healthcare, since we pay more per capita than any other nation, soon nearly 20 percent of our gross domestic product. In many areas of medicine, particularly in research, we are leading the world. But in others, we are not keeping pace.
We have the second-worst newborn mortality rate in the industrialized world, and rank highest in preventable medical errors. Even worse, one in six Americans has no access to high-quality medical care. What we need from the next president is real leadership and a vision for changing what's wrong with our healthcare system.
Senators John McCain and Barack Obama have reform plans that take divergent paths, neither of which is as comprehensive as Clinton's. Obama would require that children have health coverage, but not adults. The problem with that is if there is no mandate for adults, the young and the healthy will opt out, leaving the older and sicker in the system. This would likely force premiums up.
Obama takes a page from the Massachusetts health reform law and would require employers to offer "meaningful coverage" or contribute to a new public plan for the uninsured and small businesses. He also says health insurance would be more affordable with lower co-pays and deductibles, and he would require insurers to offer coverage without exclusion for preexisting conditions. He would also allow those without insurance through an employer to buy into plans now available to some federal employees.
McCain's plan follows the Republican playbook, that the answer is to cut costs and inspire all Americans to buy insurance by means of tax incentives. His plan would end the tax deduction that employers get for their share of employees' premiums, thus undercutting the employer base of most families' insurance. Instead, he would give families a $5,000 tax credit toward any coverage they buy.
The McCain camp says the tax credit should encourage insurance companies to develop plans that come in at that price, no easy task in high-cost states like Massachusetts. He would encourage competition by allowing insurance to be sold across state lines.
Both plans fall short, and neither truly promises universal access. McCain's plan is particularly radical in that it would eliminate the "safety net" that employees have come to value and would undoubtedly put more of the cost of healthcare directly on individuals and families. It would likely swell the numbers of uninsured rather than reduce them. Furthermore, individual insurance sold on the open market is inevitably more inefficient for insurers and more expensive for consumers. It may make it harder for those with chronic conditions to get health insurance.
There are three areas the next president must focus on, and all three must be in balance: making sure every American has health insurance, improving the quality of care, and controlling costs. Viable solutions to our nation's healthcare crisis will require a bold plan for action, not rhetoric. We can thank Clinton for driving that point home. Whether her health plan was right or wrong, she was tenacious and brave, and her plan was the most comprehensive and detailed. We should demand the same from McCain and Obama.
Ellen Lutch Bender is president and CEO of Bender Strategies LLC, a Boston-based healthcare consulting firm. ![]()
A look at the presidential candidates' health care proposals
By Linda Redeffer
TBY | SOUTHEAST MISSOURIAN
As candidates campaign for the nation's highest office, they make promises about reforming health care. Actually delivering on those promises can be another matter entirely.
A visit to the Cape Girardeau Senior Center revealed that most retired people there that day had Medicare and a supplement and were, for the most part, satisfied with them. Some have found they unexpectedly had to dip into their savings to pay for health care costs.
Brenda Hargrave, part-time administrative assistant at the center, has looked at the health care proposals from candidates John McCain, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. She said that while she has not yet decided whom she will vote for, she believes Obama has the best proposal.
But any real kind of health care reform will not come from anyone running for office, Hargrave said.
"While [Obama] addresses concerns, there are things going on that if they would enforce what they already have in place, the government would be out a lot less money now," she said.
Hargrave said she has 30 years' experience in medical billing, collecting and management. She has seen first hand where reform needs to take place, she said.
Health care reform, she said, should start with the "usual and customary rates," or UCR, established by Medicare and Medicaid. Medicare/Medicaid providers say they will pay 80 percent of an insured person's medical costs, but in fact pay an amount based on what they consider "usual and customary," often less than what a doctor or hospital charges. Physicians and hospitals write off the difference and recoup it from patients with private insurance or uninsured patients who are expected to pay full price for procedures, often in advance of being treated, Hargrave said.
"If doctors participate in Medicare they're not allowed to charge more than a certain amount. Some doctors refuse to take any new Medicare patients because they know they can't get any more money," she said. "They leave room on their schedule for other patients with private health insurance because they know they will get more money."
"Everybody needs the same UCR, whether private, Medicare, Medicaid or whatever. No insurance should be charged more than the UCR; UCR should be established across the board."
Better oversight on Medicare/Medicaid billing could save hundreds of thousands of dollars, Hargrave contends.
"I have personal knowledge of one Medicare patient who had a problem with Medicare," she said. "I kept billing, trying to get them to pay. When they did pay, they paid 20 times for the same office procedure. The money went in that patient's account as a credit. I was told not to return credits until somebody found them."
When she made one company aware of double billing for a one-time procedure, she said "nothing was done about it. That's why insurance costs are out of line."
Hargrave said more people should monitor their doctors' office billing procedures and codes and compare what is being charged with the work actually delivered.
"If we could get that done, then health insurance will be within reason and the government will have a lot more money," she said.
Hargrave said she would like to see part-time employees have access to the same insurance as full-time employees. For a semiretired person not yet on Medicare, the cost of health insurance leaves little money for other living expenses. Yet some companies, she said, will hire several part-time people to avoid the cost of providing insurance for a full-time employee.
Monitoring costs and codes would be frustrating and time-consuming for most people. Karen Riley of Cape Girardeau said she and her husband, Dean, are both on Medicare and have a supplemental policy. Both Medicare and the supplement pay for mammograms.
"I called Southeast Missouri Hospital to see if it is in the network," she said. "They said yes. But the doctor who read it was out of network. Since Jan. 15, both insurance companies are arguing over who is going to pay the bill. It has still not been paid."
Riley said she and her husband pay high premiums for their supplemental insurance, partly because she has a pre-existing condition. They dipped into their savings to pay for medical costs and insurance premiums after her husband, who worked at Southeast Missouri State University in the facilities management department, required knee surgery and retired early as a result. While he was working, the university covered the cost of his health care premiums. Until both qualified for Medicare, their monthly costs after he retired meant "we were paying money we could have spent on something else," she said. "It's got to stop somewhere. We can't keep on paying and paying and paying. You can save for retirement, but when you're saving you don't anticipate your medical costs going up and up and up."
Nor did she anticipate that just changing doctors would result in the second doctor asking for lab tests that had already been done not long before that, "so they can get more money."
Riley said she believes Clinton has the best health care proposal.
"She is saying lower premiums and give better quality insurance," Riley said.
Harry Floyd, a retired business owner, said he was considering dropping his supplemental policy because he could pay out of pocket for health expenses for less than his $145-a-month premium. His table companions urged him to keep it, saying they envied him that low premium and warning him that his medical expenses could go up drastically with one illness. Floyd is one of the few not adversely affected by health care costs. He said he supports Clinton because "she has the background. Her husband was president, so she knows a little bit about the ins and outs.
"I figure most wives know what their husbands do and she has a little insight."
Hargrave said that at whatever level health care reform comes, it has less to do with whomever is elected than with the person at the bureaucratic level chosen to implement and manage it. She said she told that to U.S. Rep. Kenny Hulshof when he campaigned at the senior center in his bid for governor.
"I told [him] if anybody is going to reform the health system, it needs to be somebody who knows what he is doing and knows what the program is all about, not somebody who donated money to a campaign," she said.
This article was printed in the June edition of TBY (The Best Years), a special publication of the Southeast Missourian.

